As part of his BBC Conspiracy Road Trip (shown in October 2012), comedian Andrew Maxwell took his creationist team to visit professor of evolutionary biology Tim White in the US.
At around 44:40 Andrew goes on about “evidence” as if evolutionists must be right because they base their thinking on evidence, unaware of the beliefs [...]

Continue reading about Andrew Maxwell’s carbon dating blooper on his BBC Conspiracy Road Trip

Tas Walker on October 25th, 2012

Email from a teacher about a recent Year 12 Higher School Certificate Biology Exam held on Friday 19 October 2012 across all schools in New South Wales, Australia.
Just thought you might find it interesting and frustrating to know that even in this years NSW HSC Biology exam, the fraudulent embryos originally drawn by Haeckel [...]

Continue reading about Frauds promoted in Australian schools in government exam

Tas Walker on September 1st, 2012

CMI’s Richard Fangrad has a very funny response to the attack on creationism by Bill Nye, the science guy: CMI: Evolutionism is not appropriate for anyone.

Bill’s Youtube video is called Bill Nye: Creationism Is Not Appropriate For Children. It’s had over 3 million views and is full of the usual logical falacies, which Richard Fangrad [...]

Continue reading about Bill Nye ‘The Science Guy’ has a problem with creationism

Tas Walker on May 10th, 2012

Paleobiologist Simon Conway Morris, of Burgess Shale fame, says that examination of the fossil evidence demands a radical rewriting of evolution. Why so?
In an interview with the University of Cambridge’s alumni magazine (Issue 65, Lent 2012, pp. 32–35) Conway Morris says it’s because of “convergence”.
That’s the tendency of very different organisms to evolve [...]

Continue reading about Evidence for design demands radical evolution rewrite

Tas Walker on December 6th, 2011

What do Steve Jones and Hans Christian Andersen have in common? They both tell great fairy tales.
 
Evolutionary geneticist Steve told a beauty in his latest article Islam, Charles Darwin and the denial of science published in The Telegraph on 3 December 2011. Here is how he starts:
The story began long ago, when our ancestors [...]

Continue reading about Steve Jones and Hans Christian Andersen

On Sunday evening 5 June 2011, I was on a panel at a church north of Brisbane answering questions on evolution and the age of the earth.
I represented the biblical young-earth position.
The three other scientists on the panel held to various old-earth views, and were:

Jonathon Cramb, who is completing a PhD in palaeontology.
Dr [...]

Continue reading about Panel discussion on creation, evolution and the age of the earth

There is a huge battle shaping up within evangelical circles over the authority of the Bible, a debate that will spill into the wider community and impact scientific, geological and academic realms.
The orthodox evangelical view held by the pioneers of science, including geological pioneer Nicholas Steno, is that the Bible records real history: that [...]

Continue reading about Albert Mohler and RC Sproul start historic debate over geology, evolution and the age of the earth

Tas Walker on March 29th, 2010

Anyone who publishes a rebuttal to any of Dawkins’ books will be branded as a flea. From his own site:
Many “parasitic” authors have released books which use Richard’s name or titles to sell their own books …
So any critique is dismissed as “parasitic”.
The latest book given that status is Jonathan Sarfati’s The [...]

Continue reading about Dawkins and his fleas

Tas Walker on March 9th, 2010

I wrote a note to a couple of the politicians who appeared on last night’s Q and A.
I saw you on Q & A last night and I appreciate the way you tried to stand up to Dawkins’ attacks on the Christian faith.
I thought it was interesting that not one person on the panel could [...]

Continue reading about To some politicians who appeared with Richard Dawkins

Tas Walker on March 9th, 2010

Perhaps there is a journalist in Australia who is brave enough to ask it.
Why won’t he debate creationists?
If he is so sure of his science as he continually says, and creationists are so ignorant and ill informed, then why not have it out once for all? Even some of his fans from his web [...]

Continue reading about A question for Richard Dawkins