Eromanga Sea: Noah’s Flood covered Australia

posted in: Noah's Flood | 3
'Eromanga Sea' covering Australia during 'Jurassic' (from ABC OZfossil website).
'Eromanga Sea' covering Australia during 'Cretaceous' (from ABC OZfossils website).
You can see evidence for Noah’s Flood everywhere but unless you know what you are looking for you will not recognize it. Did you know that geology books, museums and fossil websites describe the effects of the Flood in graphic detail, even giving special names to different aspects of it?

The diagram at left is from the science section of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation website called OZfossils. It says, “About one hundred and ten million years ago a shallow sea covered what is now arid inland Australia.”

This shallow inland sea has been called the Eromanga Sea and it is shown in the diagram. This is evidence for Noah’s Flood. The Bible says:

“The waters increased and lifted up the ark, and it rose high above the earth. The waters prevailed and greatly increased on the earth, and the ark moved about on the surface of the waters. And the waters prevailed exceedingly on the earth, and all the high hills under the whole heaven were covered. (Genesis 7:17–19)”

The reason why most scientists can explore this amazing geological evidence but not connect the dots is that they have the wrong search image in their minds. (These days we are well aware of how a scientist’s search image can affect their work.) Actually, the search philosophy they use was purposely designed in the early 1800s to avoid seeing Noah’s Flood. Some call that search image ‘uniformitarianism’, although geologists today prefer the term ‘actualism’.

Let’s mention a few of the many reasons why they don’t see the Flood.

  • The dates are wrong. They say it was 100 million years ago, so no one connects that it is actually Noah’s Flood they are looking at. But the dates were assigned by assuming the sediments were deposited slowly, when in fact they were deposited catastrophically. Hence the imaginary time disappears. Geologists these days routinely recognize that sedimentation was rapid, especially considering the enormous dinosaur fossils preserved in the area.
  • It was not a past environment. They assume they are looking at environments that existed for thousands, even millions of years. However, the kilometre thicknesses of sediments were deposited rapidly over a period of weeks or months during the Flood, as the waters were rising on the earth. (See Great Artesian Basin.)
  • The vegetation did not grow in the area. They assume the vegetation grew where it was buried, but it was carried into the area after being ripped out the places where it did grow. What we are looking at was not a lush rainforest but the place where the debris was dumped.
  • The animals did not normally live in the area. They assume the fossilized animals lived in the area. However, these were carried in by the floodwaters, some dead and some alive. The live ones continued to flee the rising waters (for a while) and we find their footprints at various places (see Dinosaur trackways (pdf)). The dead ones were buried in sediments in the area (had to be buried rapidly and lots of sediment). That is why is it common to find land and sea animals buried together. Also it is common to find animals and plants from warm climates fossilized in areas that now have cold climates (see Paradox of warm climate vegetation in Antarctica).
  • The sea covered the whole of Australia, not just a proportion of it. In the above diagram, geologists show the extent of the inland sea according to the extent of the sediments that exist now. From the diagram we see there was a lot of Australia that was supposedly not covered with water at this time. However, the sediments covered a much greater area in the past. Kilometres of thickness and vast areas of sediment were eroded away. This happened later in the Flood, especially as the floodwaters receded from the land (see discussion on Perth geology and Collie basin).

Next time you see a display about the geological history of Australia, or wherever you live, realise that they are reporting evidence for Noah’s Flood. Once you understand the way they think, you can connect the dots and see Noah’s Flood in graphic detail.

3 Responses

  1. Laurie Appleton

    Lol. In the “Spam protection” question I mistakenly read it as 5 + 97 (i.e. I read the question mark ? as a 7

    However would you comment on the possibility that prior to the flood, there was NO such thing as Australia and that the whole present land masses did not exist at all?

    Thank you. Best wishes.

    Tas Walker responds:
    Hi Laurie, The continents are covered with lots of sedimentary material containing fossils which was deposited during the Flood. Some biblical geologists suggest the continental crust forming the continents existed before the Flood. Others suggest the ocean basins and the continents were completely different before the Flood. I lean to the latter view, that the existing continents did not exist before the Flood, but that question is still open.

  2. Jennifer

    Another wonderful and informative article. I so enjoy reading these, printing them out and sharing with my family, and others. Thank you again for all you do

  3. Constantine

    Dear Tas, glancing as a professional geologist at the Earth geolgical column, can you state that all the sediments, from the Paleosoic Era and higher – could be formed catastrophically?
    I heard that at least some of the sediments require very long time periods to be formed.

    Tas Walker responds:
    Hi Constantine, Yes, it all was formed catastrophically, over a period of months. You would need to be specific about which sediments require a very long time to form before I could respond. A lot of these so-called problems are due to the geology being wrongly interpreted.